Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 |
1781. When it's safer to bring Tengus into WH's than mine in high-sec, why mine? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Spikeflach wrote: People are just as entitled to mine like how gankers are entitled to suicide gank. Except its easier for the suicide ganker to get the results they want. thanks for making it easy, miners!
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 17:05:00
|
1782. When does all the ganking make mining worth it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: They already chose the low risk low reward path, till some months ago mining things like ice yielded an OH SO GROSS 5M per hour. That certainly competed with supercap farming in 0.0, it is THE reason why 0.0 seccers leave...
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 06:51:00
|
1783. Grows some balls. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
the beatings will continue until morale improves
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 06:48:00
|
1784. Grows some balls. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: null sec should be more usable for more people. it is, you only need to form an alliance, get ISK together for a sov structure fund, organize fleets, take space, hold that space and figure out the rest from there
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 06:37:00
|
1785. Vote Yes on "Removing Local from 0.0" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
one of the differences is that this doesn't show up on top of you in a wormhole
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 06:13:00
|
1786. Vote Yes on "Removing Local from 0.0" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xorv wrote: Why do you say that? ..and do you also think that the only thing distinguishing Wormhole Space and NPC Null Sec is Local and belt rats? There are numerous other differences between nullsec and wormhole space, and those differenc...
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 06:08:00
|
1787. Vote Yes on "Removing Local from 0.0" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xorv wrote: Chunicha wrote: 0.0 NPC without local would be exactly like w-space with the only exception being that the belts would have rats. Clearly someone who has never even been to WH space. You're clearly someone who has never ...
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 05:31:00
|
1788. Vote Yes on "Removing Local from 0.0" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom you should stop posting about 0.0 and concern yourself with your mining/l4s
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 05:31:00
|
1789. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nope it's yours
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 05:28:00
|
1790. why don't minerbears just fly with logi? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: I want to see 290k EHP fit with eight Modulated Deep Core Miner IIs right now. k http://i.imgur.com/K3rZz.jpg
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 05:24:00
|
1791. Placeholder - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Fish Brain wrote: Quote: 23GoonswarmOHGOD This isn't the Goonswarm you're looking for. Heh you think anybody is going to bet on us
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 03:48:00
|
1792. Greifers vs CCP, Hulkageddon is winning. Time for CCP to code changes. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lady Flute wrote: Lord Zim wrote: I wouldn't be surprised if the only change CCP really needs to do, is to make it so pods aren't treated specially. I.e. a -10 pod would get popped just like he would in a ship. vOv That would be a very w...
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 03:25:00
|
1793. Mittani spitting his dummy out... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
hulks take two months to train into to fly them passably but please continue handwaving about how hulkageddon, which targets ships that take months to train into, is driving away new players
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 02:38:00
|
1794. The perfect solution to satisfy PVP and Carebears - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No, this: http://eve-search.com/thread/561860-0/page/all http://eve-search.com/thread/564017-0/page/all http://eve-search.com/thread/565740-0/page/all
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 01:19:00
|
1795. Incursions, now the dust has settled. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Apolyon I wrote: incursion is safer, better isk, why do I have to risk my shiny multibil ships?? you never stopped to think "hmm, why is the best ISK in hisec?"
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 01:08:00
|
1796. EVE IN DECLINE -- GRAPHS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I predict that by 11:00 UTC the servers will go empty
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.06.01 01:02:00
|
1797. Why the hate for Hi-Sec players? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Asuri Kinnes wrote: Full Disclosure: ADHC doesn't condone ganking in Hi-sec, we prefer our pilots gank in our connecting wormholes, low-sec or null ~honoure~
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.05.31 21:59:00
|
1798. Sticky:EVE Online: Inferno - Issues thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vimsy Vortis wrote: So If you use GSF as your example by default it costs you 552 million (50 base fee + 502 member count fee) but if you already have one active war it costs you 1.1 billion. A bunch of people have figured out how to wardec ...
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.05.31 21:54:00
|
1799. Incursions, now the dust has settled. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CaptainFalcon07 wrote: Why are you doing incursions when your corp lives in a wormhole? I too would like to know this
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.05.31 20:53:00
|
1800. I Bid FareWell Also - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd reasonably expect anybody posting about quitting to do it with their main, considering that they can't really go after you if you're quitting , now can they?
- by Richard Desturned - at 2012.05.31 20:50:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |